An Abuja High Court on Thursday struck out the criminal charges filed by the Federal Government against the senator representing Kogi Central, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, effectively ending a closely watched legal case that generated widespread national debate.
Court documents revealed that the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation submitted a Notice of Discontinuance, leading the court to formally dismiss the criminal defamation and related charges earlier brought against the lawmaker.
The case, which drew significant public attention, arose from comments Akpoti-Uduaghan allegedly made during a televised interview. Her prosecution had sparked intense discussions around freedom of expression, political accountability and the proper use of prosecutorial authority in a democratic society.
The Notice of Discontinuance, dated December 12, 2025, brought an end to proceedings in suit number FHC/ABJ/CR/195/2025. While presiding over the matter, Justice C. N. Oji acknowledged the notice and accordingly struck out the case.
In his remarks, the judge noted that the development highlighted the importance of restraint in the exercise of prosecutorial powers.
“The court hopes that this decision will encourage restraint, healing and respect for the rule of law in our democratic process,” he said.
Counsel representing the Federal Government confirmed the withdrawal of the charges in open court.
“On behalf of the Honourable Attorney-General of the Federation, a notice of discontinuance has been filed in line with the provisions of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act. This step was taken in the overall interest of justice and public confidence in the legal system,” the counsel stated.
Speaking after the court session, Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan described the ruling as a vindication of her stance.
“Today’s outcome reinforces my faith in the rule of law. I remain dedicated to serving my constituents and defending the democratic rights of all Nigerians,” she said, while expressing gratitude to her legal team and supporters for their unwavering support throughout the case.
The dismissal of the charges follows months of legal controversy and sustained public debate, with several civil society and human rights groups previously condemning the prosecution as an attempt to suppress free speech and political participation.